收索视频The Jesuit is the alias of a man who was wrongly accused and became imprisoned. When The Jesuit discovers that his wife has been murdered and his son kidnapped and taken to Mexico, he elaborates a complex and dangerous plan to rescue his son and avenge the death of his deceased wife.
梦扬
回复 :张小石第一次看到乡村摄影师在村头给人照相，那个方方的照相机深深地吸引了他。暑假里，远在城里的表哥带着照相机回来看家，使得张小石能近距离接触到照相机，有机会自己摄影，没想到的是，他拍的照片表哥给他投到杂志社，竟然发表了，还获得了优秀奖，这让张小石很是激动，使他有了得到一台真正的照相机的想法。为了这个目标，他不断的努力。但家里的状况实现不了他的愿望，依靠自己的力量根本无法得到相机。张小石无意中看到一则省长给别人捐赠的新闻，他带着激动而单纯的想法给省长写了一封信，然而一场意想不到的事情发生了……
回复 :聪明漂亮的公司女秘书玛尔妮·埃德加（蒂比·海德莉 Tippi Hedren饰）实际上是一名品行不端的女窃贼，嗜偷如命。几个月后，她偷走了公司保险柜里的将近一万美元的现金，恰好公司的大主顾马克·鲁德兰（肖恩·康纳利 Sean Connery饰）也在场。他对这位冷艳神秘的女人有着浓厚的兴趣。更有缘分的是，马克就是玛尔妮的新任老板。玛尔妮对红色的东西始终有着一种神经性的恐惧，这更让马克觉得这个怪异的女孩背后一定有着什么故事，企图接近她。鲁德兰猛烈的爱情攻势，让玛尔妮倍感恐慌和不安。虽然她也对这个风度翩翩的英俊男人动了心，却仍习惯性地从公司的保险柜里偷出现金，打算远走高飞。马克及时阻止了她，并引导玛尔妮说出真话。面对自己难以逾越的心理障碍，玛尔妮内心中那段不愿告人的身世之谜即将揭开面纱。
回复 :康沃尔渔村的风景明信片田园诗误导了人们。虽然过去钓鱼是一种养家糊口的方式，但如今富有的伦敦游客纷纷下山，取代了当地人，当地人的生计因此受到威胁。史蒂文和马丁兄弟的关系也很紧张。马丁是一个没有船的渔夫，因为史蒂文开始用它来为一整天的游客提供更赚钱的旅游。他们卖掉了这座家庭别墅，现在看来，最后一场战斗是和新主人在海边的停车位上展开。然而，情况很快就失控了，而不仅仅是因为车轮夹钳。Bait是一种黑白，手工制作，16毫米胶片制作的电影。许多关于鱼、网、龙虾、长靴、绳结和渔篮的特写镜头让人想起了蒙太奇景点的理论。对不同社会阶层的描述——可以说是阶级关系——也让人想起了英国电影中的社会现实主义传统。然而，最重要的是，在影像中不同层次的电影历史参考文献之下，当前许多政治关联正在等待被发现。The picture-postcard idyll of the Cornwall fishing village is misleading. While fishing used to be a way of supporting oneself, wealthy London tourists have now descended and are displacing the locals, whose livelihood is thus threatened. The relationship between brothers Steven and Martin is also strained. Martin is a fisherman without a boat, since Steven started using it for far more lucrative tours for all the day-trippers. They’ve sold the family cottage and now it seems that the final battle to be fought is that with the new owners over the parking space next to the sea. Yet the situation soon gets out of hand, and not just because of the wheel clamp.Bait is a black-and-white film shot on hand-processed 16mm. Numerous close-ups of fish, nets, lobsters, wellington boots, knots and catch baskets bring to mind the theory of a montage of attractions. The depiction of the different social strata – one could speak of class relations – is also reminiscent of the tradition of social realism in British cinema. Above all, however, a whole lot of current political relevance is waiting to be discovered beneath the different layers of film historical references contained in the images.
