荒山亮
发表于9分钟前回复 :1969年冬,山寒水瘦的黄河岸边。穷庄稼汉赵大30岁还未娶亲,母亲临终前将他托付给本族大爷赵天堂。邻村姑娘狗旦与赵大相好,她出身不好,母亲病重无钱医治,赵大出于好心,卖掉自留羊资助她们。谁知,公社武装部长米来昌竟粗暴干涉,带人抓走狗旦。批斗大会上,狗旦备受污辱,赵大挺身而出大闹会场,结果遭人毒打。狗旦四顾茫茫,万念俱灭,跳进汹涌的黄河。狗旦死后,赵大的好友双喜四处为之求亲,但终无着落。赵大为了满足母亲的遗愿,一气之下揭下"阴婚启事",米来昌横加斥责,赵大怒不可遏,顶风冒雪,将姑娘的尸骨埋进祖坟,挥泪离乡。星移斗转,冬去春来。赵大扦着春天的足迹重返故乡。邻居青青姑娘年轻漂亮、大方泼辣,但因换亲被迫嫁给了一个比她大十多岁的拐子,赵大同情她的不幸,青青从心底里爱上了赵大。一次赶集,赵大发现有人在自己书包内悄悄塞了双新布鞋,尤其那张劝慰他摆脱烦恼、投入新生活的纸条,滋润着他干涸的心田。他首先想到青青,但布鞋不是青青所送,赵大隐入迷茫。米来昌有愧当年迫害赵大、逼死狗旦,几次登门道歉,并要为赵大说媒,勾起赵大无限痛楚。双喜又为赵大介绍了农村教师沈玉兰。正当二人确定婚约时,赵大得知玉兰竟是自己"死妻"的寡母,深为惊讶。同族长辈坚决反对,玉兰的婆母极力阻挠。而玉兰又说出那双布鞋和纸条是她所赠,赵大左右为难。消息传开后,隐入无限痛苦的青青,在黄河边交给赵大一双她亲手做的布鞋,在他面前长跪不起。一时间,赵大的婚事又起波澜……
朴贤基
发表于8分钟前回复 :Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal here shows us his uncanny ability to cast his characters perfectly came early in his career.Adrienne Shelley is a near perfect foil to herself, equal parts annoying teen burgeoning in her sexuality (though using sex for several years); obsessed with doom and inspired by idealism gone wrong she is deceptively – and simultaneously – complex and simple. Her Audrey inspires so many levels of symbolism it is almost embarrassingly rich (e.g., her modeling career beginning with photos of her foot – culminating her doing nude (but unseen) work; Manhattan move; Europe trip; her stealing, then sleeping with the mechanics wrench, etc.)As Josh, Robert Burke gives an absolutely masterful performance. A reformed prisoner/penitent he returns to his home town to face down past demons, accept his lot and begin a new life. Dressed in black, and repeatedly mistaken for a priest, he corrects everyone ("I'm a mechanic"), yet the symbolism is rich: he abstains from alcohol, he practices celibacy (is, in fact a virgin), and seemingly has taken on vows of poverty, and humility as well. The humility seems hardest to swallow seeming, at times, almost false, a pretense. Yet, as we learn more of Josh we see genuineness in his modesty, that his humility is indeed earnest and believable. What seems ironic is the character is fairly forthright in his simplicity, yet so richly drawn it becomes the viewer who wants to make him out as more than what he actually is. A fascinatingly written character, perfectly played.The scene between Josh and Jane (a wonderful, young Edie Falco . . . "You need a woman not a girl") is hilarious . . . real. But Hartley can't leave it as such and his trick, having the actors repeat the dialogue over-and-over becomes frustratingly "arty" and annoying . . . until again it becomes hilarious. What a terrific sense of bizarre reality this lends the film (like kids in a perpetual "am not"/"are too" argument).Hartley's weaves all of a small neighborhood's idiosyncrasies into a tapestry of seeming stereotypes but which delves far beneath the surface, the catalyst being that everyone believes they know what the "unbelievable truth" of the title is, yet no two people can agree (including our hero) on what exactly that truth is. A wonderful little movie with some big ideas.