生活给的考验还在继续，欢乐颂小区22楼的五个女生，也迎来了事业、生活以及情感上新的挑战和机遇。叶蓁蓁开始了与戴维的爱情，两人非常合拍，但一心扑在科研上的她还是不可避免地被卷入各种工作上的非议和两个家庭的拉锯中；方芷衡终于走出过去的阴影，但性格也逐渐改变，22楼这个热闹的团体激发了她内心柔软的一面；朱喆一再遭到上级的打压，但她相信天无绝人之路，这个社会多的是可供平常人发光发热的领域；何悯鸿还在经历着更多的挫折，她在男友的影响下，和22楼的女生渐行渐远；余初晖把更多精力投入工作，终于走出了毕业以来的迷茫。22楼就仿佛一个避风港，这五个女孩之间虽然也会有争执和质疑，但更多时候却能够互相理解和关怀，彼此给予帮助，真诚交换意见，携手面对生活里的大小困难，各自收获成长与蜕变。
回复 :弗令一家人经历上次那场可怕的遭遇后，举家迁居到新的地方，希望从此平安无事。但是地狱里的恶灵并未罢手，又次正蠢蠢欲动准备再度侵袭。
回复 :在1950年的非洲，一位非洲部落的巫师用邪念杀死了欧洲人。
回复 :A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.- JohnHowardReid, imdb
