阿胜（伊藤淳史 饰）年纪轻轻就夺得了新人奖，宅男在小说界一举成名。然而，宅男他却就此后劲不足丧失了灵感，看着人气一步步的下滑，阿胜的编辑建议他以当下最流行的鬼怪题材小说为题材进行创作，这让只擅长写小清新文艺作品的阿胜感到非常的为难，然而，编辑的一片好心不可辜负，阿胜就这样半推半就的结下了这项艰难的任务。为了找灵感，阿胜从城里搬到了乡下一幢独栋古宅里写作，可是，这里宁静悠谧的气氛并不能令阿胜获得任何的灵感。一天，一只小猫自顾自的闯进了阿胜家的后院中，之后竟然成为了那里的常客，在编辑美知留（忽那汐里 饰）的帮助下，阿胜决定将后院建造成一个猫咪乐园。
回复 :影片根据真实事件改编，丹尼尔扮演一位年轻的联邦调查局探员，深入新纳粹组织卧底，查出密谋制作脏弹的恐怖分子。影片是丹尼尔·莱格西斯的导演长片处女作，预计2016年上映。
回复 :Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
廖自升
回复 :1986年，瑞典国家健康与福利部委托导演罗伊·安德森就艾滋病题材拍摄一部教育影片，以便在学校和军队向学生和新兵传播艾滋病源头和防御的信息。但在电影拍摄期间，健康与福利部要求安德森终止该项目。原因是他们观看了已拍摄部分的素材，并对影片里信息的可靠性和拍摄风格提出了质疑。安德森并未遵循，而是凭几之力完成了该部电影。关于艾滋病的起源，影片采用了阴谋论式的论调。在它的描述中，艾滋病病毒并非起源于非洲并由动物传播给人类，而是由美国科学家在实验室中创造出来，并随后应用于人体实验。今天，这部电影被看做是罗伊·安德森个人风格形成中的重要一步。
