精品Paris, the 1980s. Three students decide to celebrate their graduation with a visit of the Paris catacombs. But something, someone, is hunting them. Trapped deep underground, the group needs to get out before it's too late...
精品Paris, the 1980s. Three students decide to celebrate their graduation with a visit of the Paris catacombs. But something, someone, is hunting them. Trapped deep underground, the group needs to get out before it's too late...
回复 :故事讲述了一个打工社畜突然接手濒临倒闭的动物园,他试图与奇葩员工们完成一场令人匪夷所思的动物园营业计划的故事。
回复 :对14岁的小艾来说,青春是一抹冰岛首都雷克雅未克的天色,就算阳光闪耀着,也总觉冷冽冰蓝,难解而神秘。在这个懵懂又冲动的年纪,同侪偶尔带你上天堂,但多半一起下地狱,弱肉强食和情义相挺的生存法则同时并存,上一秒才被霸凌的小艾,下一秒就开始保护被自己哥儿们欺负的孩子。各种血气方刚的暴力,抽丝剥茧出原生家庭的种种不堪,而发育中的身体,也悄然在夜梦里偷偷蜕变,滋长出令人不知所措却前所未有的成长体验。
回复 :A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.- JohnHowardReid, imdb